Search The Scriptures

This article was published in ”Evangel", 10.2 (Summer 1992): 25-29. [p.25] Introduction We approach theodicy from two angles: the authority of Scripture and the need for contemporary relevance. These two approaches should not be set over against each other. They are to be held together. If we believe that Scripture is ‘the living and abiding word of God’ (1 Peter 1:23), this will influence the way in which we seek to attain contemporary relevance. If we are inclined to lightly set aside the Scriptures with a view to being relevant, our procedure carries with it the implied denial of the ‘living and abiding’ character of Scripture. If, on the other hand, we are firmly convinced that the Bible is ‘the living and abiding word of God’, we will not view the Bible as an obstacle to contemporary relevance. Rather, we will see this ‘living and abiding word of God’ as the foundation of relevance. Normative Scripture and Apologetics A real commitment to the normativity of Sc

Charles M. Cameron, “A Biblical Approach to Theodicy,” Evangel 10:2 (1992): 25-29 Charles M. Cameron, “The Message of Numbers,” Evangel 11:2 (1993): 35-39 Charles M. Cameron, “The Building and Dedication of the Temple (1 Kings 5-8),” Evangel 11:3 (1993): 66-68 -  https://biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/evangel/11-3_066.pdf Charles M. Cameron, “Lamentations,” Evangel 12:1 (1994): 2-4 Charles M. Cameron, “Pride and Faith in Berkouwer's Studies in Dogmatics ,” Evangel 12:2 (1994): 50-53 Charles M. Cameron, “The Use of the Bible in Evangelical Preaching Today,” Evangel 13:1 (1995): 16-21 Charles M. Cameron, “The Place of Theology in the Contemporary Church: Where does God fit in to Contemporary Religious Debate?” Evangel 14:3 (1996): 77-80 Charles M. Cameron, "John Hick's Religious World," Evangel 15.1 (Spring 1997): 22-27 Charles M. Cameron, "Can We Give an Adequate Account of Human Experience Without Reference to God?" Evangel 18.1